Episode 53: Outtake 4

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | View Comments

Episode 52: Kickin’ it Old School

  • http://www.bluemic.com/snowball/
  • http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/07/26/1552249/Jailbreaking-iPhone-Now-Legal?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2FslashdotYourRightsOnline+%28Slashdot%3A+Your+Rights+Online%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
  • http://www.darknet.org.uk/2010/07/wpa2-vulnerability-discovered-hole-196-a-flaw-in-gtk-group-temporal-key/
  • http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/07/28/195244/DefCon-Ninja-Badges-Let-Hackers-Do-Battle?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2FslashdotGames+%28Slashdot%3A+Games%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-9JcOZlMlLY
  • http://idle.slashdot.org/story/10/07/15/1333235/Nigerian-Scammer-Gets-the-Laptop-He-Deserves
  • http://www.bleedingcool.com/forums/showthread.php?10832-419-Scammers-Become-Superheroes-Get-Own-Comic-Book
  • http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/07/26/1413240/Scientists-Create-Equation-For-a-Perfect-Handshake?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2FslashdotScience+%28Slashdot%3A+Science%29&utm_content=Google+Reader
  • http://www.thisiswhyyourefat.com/?p=1071
  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | View Comments

Episode 51: If You Start Taking Your Clothes Off, I’ll Stab You With a Pen Comic Con Style

This was a free form episode, so there really aren’t any show notes.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | View Comments

Episode 50: Outtake 3

More goofy crap than your brain can handle, it’s time to take some medicine.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | View Comments

Old Media vs. New Media – A Fight Neither Side Can Win

I think the best way to explain it would be to say that Old Media is aristocratic, while New Media is democratic. Old Media is about people who are trained in finding, filtering, and delivering something to the general public.  For example, a newspaper reporter has to hunt for a story, find it, determine whether it is truely newsworthy, then write it up, and submit it to an editor.  Then the editor has to review it, edit it (duh), and decide if it will get published.  These people are not experts (arguably) in what they are reporting on; instead they are experts on reporting.  There is a huge distinction here.  A reporter might not know the difference between their ass and a hole in the ground, but they know how to tell whether that difference is something worth telling other people about.  New Media is grass-roots.  People create their own content, then put it somewhere where other people can find it and decide for themselves if it is worthy.  Using the same example of a news story, if a person writes about something that is happening, they can put it on twitter, or digg.com and if enough people retweet it or digg it, then it has been voted on to be relevant for more people to see.  Are these people experts?  Maybe, but not necessarily.  A youtube clip might get 100,000 views even though it is some dude that happened to have a camera with him when something funny happened.  Or, it might be people who worked in television, then created their own network of internet videos to post on their website (Revision3).

Old Media vs New Media is not about where the media is delivered.  For example, a news article on CNN.com is still Old Media, and a TV show on public access is still New Media.  The one is just diguised in the form that traditionally belongs to the other.  I love Hulu.com, but it is Old Media.  iTunes has sold millions of songs, but it is still Old Media music created for a record label in a fancy music studio.  Find a song on MySpace that was recorded in some guy’s basement, who doesn’t have a record contract of any kind, and you are getting to this fancy New Media stuff.

But then, by that definition, a lot of old (chronologically) media could be considered New Media.  Well, I would say yes.  Which is why I say that Old Media vs New Media doesn’t really matter.  New Media isn’t new, its just easier to find now than it used to be.  At the end of the day, I would probably rather watch a movie that was made by a movie studio than by a guy in his back yard.  Of course, there are exceptions, like Film Riot.  I would rather listen to an album that sounds professionally produced than an album that sounds like it was recorded in the lead singer’s garage.  But I am ever-thankful that the band has the ability to put that poorly recorded album up where people can find it, then tell their friends about it.  With enough word of mouth, they can get gigs where they can make some money to spend more time on their next record so they can book more gigs and get more word of mouth, and eventually, if they are good enough, they will be able to remaster that first raw album into something that you can actually listen to without your ears bleeding from the technical mistakes.

We are told that New Media is the next big thing, but that stuff was always there, it was just harder to find.  Of course, the fact that there are more New Media success stories means that other normal people are realizing that they can make stuff, too, which means that the number of New people creating Media is getting bigger and bigger.  Proponents of New Media are starting this Old Media New Media war so that they can draw more attention to it, because attention is what they don’t have.  Old Media has already established a consumer base, so attention is something they already have plenty of.  It doesn’t benefit them to draw attention to the fight.

Will Old Media always exist? Yes. Will New Media always exist? Yes. It will get easier to find New Media, and it will get harder to justify the costs of Old Media because of it, but neither will ever really win.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Blog | View Comments

Episode 49: Double Rainbow

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | Tagged , , , | View Comments

Episode 48: Yourythmics

in which cha0s returns to #leverage, and @wilw gets screwed by drm for the last time – WWdN: In Exile

MPAA Says No Proof Needed in P2P Copyright Infringement Lawsuits | Threat Level | Wired.com

Peer-to-Peer File-Sharing and Copyright Infringement

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google Inc. – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

10 Big Myths about copyright explained

DMCA | Electronic Frontier Foundation

Digital Millennium Copyright Act – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Viacom vs. Google, legal shenanigans abound | Media Maverick – CNET News

Google beats Viacom in YouTube court case, BitTorrent users win

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | Tagged , , | View Comments

Open Source FTW!

I feel pretty strongly about copyright. For me it started because of “free” software. I’m cheap and I don’t like to pay for things if I don’t have to and I was always happy to try out a free piece of software (and open to figuring out how to use a not-so-free piece of software too). This lead me to find open source software, which at first just meant “open source = free” to me. As my understanding of the open source movement grew, so did my opinion on copyright.

Copyright and patent laws in this country are outdated, outmoded, and generally ludicrous. The fact that Microsoft can patent some of the most basic algorithms in computer science for the sole purpose of suing someone for copyright infringement if they don’t like that product is absurd to me. Copyrighting what can be considered common knowledge or fundamental knowledge in the field is just plain stupid to me and I feel like its a travesty that there are all these worthless patents and copyrights out there miring people in the terrible legality of things. This kind of thing stunts innovation and hurts the industry.

While the open source movement is relatively young and still developing, look at how much innovation has come from that sector: projects like Open Office (an office application suite), Apache (what most web servers run to host web sites), Linux (operating system), GIMP (image editing software) all open source and all very well developed projects.

Each project has a community that builds up around it, drawing more people as it becomes more popular. People report bugs, people fix bugs, the project becomes better, more people start to use it, rinse and repeat. The most insignificant person in the world has a say in the project and anybody with the know-how is capable of patching bugs. If the project wasn’t open source, would things remain this way? Look at the way Microsoft handles things with their products. Most of the time a bug is found its treated the way most of corporate America operates and that is, hush the person that found it, stick your head in the sand, and hope it goes away. There was recently a security flaw discovered in Windows that reaches back to 1993 and every operating system released by Microsoft since then up to and including Windows 7. A 17 year old vulnerability that Microsoft just pretended wasn’t there until somebody made it public. I’m not saying that every piece of closed source software is maintained in the same way, I’m just saying its harder to find and patch bugs when only your people can look at the code.

At this point I’ve made it pretty clear that I like free software and that I don’t want to have to pay for things. How then, in my Utopian world where all software is free, does a developer or company make money enough to justify creating the software in the first place? I honestly don’t know, but I think the Red Hat folks are on the right path. Red Hat creates the Red Hat Linux distribution under an open source license, so its free to use and free to be tinkered with. The way they make money is by charging enterprises for support, and a nominal fee for CD/DVDs (this isn’t required, you can download a copy for free from their site). With a support contract, you can call them up when you have a problem you can’t solve yourself and they’ll have someone help you solve it to the best of their ability. If other companies can come up with similar ways to make money and just let us poor folks have our free software, the world would be a better place.

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Blog | Tagged , , , , , | View Comments

Episode 47: A Seinfeldian Concept

You’re either repetitive, bored, or urgent

Google Reader

http://thearmageddonblog.com/

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | View Comments

Episode 46: The Internet Distracted Me

  • Share/Bookmark
Posted in Episodes | View Comments